Snapdragon 888 vs Dimensity 8200

We compared two 8-core processors: Snapdragon 888 vs Dimensity 8200 Which is Better For Gaming. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Snapdragon 888 vs Dimensity 8200 Which is Better For Gaming

Key Features :

Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 888

  • Better instruction set architecture

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8200

  • Announced 2-years and 1-month later
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 5 nm)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~20%)
  • 9% higher CPU clock speed (3100 vs 2840 MHz)

Snapdragon 888 vs Dimensity 8200 AnTuTu & Benchmarks

AnTuTu 10

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios.

CPU216104272758
GPU307062239705
Memory171239160858
UX195947225465
Total score883938893390

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance.

NameSnapdragon 888Dimensity 8200
Single-Core10571220
Multi-Core34103889
Asset compression172.8 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser108 pages/sec
PDF Renderer140.4 Mpixels/sec
Image detection86.2 images/sec
HDR118.4 Mpixels/sec
Background blur14.7 images/sec
Photo processing34.4 images/sec
Ray tracing4.63 Mpixels/sec

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal).

Stability91%95%
Graphics test31 FPS33 FPS
Score52835622

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games

PUBG Mobile83 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile60 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite26 FPS
[Ultra]
Shadowgun Legends89 FPS
[Ultra]
World of Tanks Blitz112 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact58 FPS
[Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang60 FPS
[Ultra]
DeviceAsus Zenfone 8
1080 x 2400

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 888 and Dimensity 8200

CPU

Architecture1x 2.84 GHz – Kryo 680 Prime (Cortex-X1)
3x 2.42 GHz – Kryo 680 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 680 Silver (Cortex-A55)
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex A78
3x 3 GHz – Cortex A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex A55
Cores88
Frequency2840 MHz3100 MHz
Instruction setARMv8.4-AARMv8.2-A
L1 cache512 KB
L2 cache1 MB
L3 cache4 MB4 MB
Process5 nanometers4 nanometers
Transistor count10.3 billion
TDP8 W6 W
ManufacturingSamsungTSMC

Graphics

GPU nameAdreno 660Mali-G610 MP6
ArchitectureAdreno 600Valhall 3rd gen
GPU frequency792 MHz950 MHz
Execution units26
Shading units512
Total shaders1024
FLOPS1622 Gigaflops1442 Gigaflops
Vulkan version1.11.3
OpenCL version2.02.0
DirectX version12.1

Memory

Memory typeLPDDR5LPDDR5
Memory frequency3200 MHz3200 MHz
Bus4x 16 Bit4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth51.2 Gbit/s51.2 Gbit/s
Max size24 GB16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Neural processor (NPU)Hexagon 780MediaTek APU 580
Storage typeUFS 3.0, UFS 3.1UFS 3.1
Max display resolution3840 x 21602960 x 1440
Max camera resolution1x 200MP, 2x 25MP1x 320MP
Video capture8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS4K at 60FPS
Video playback8K at 30FPS4K at 60FPS
Video codecsH.264, H.265, VP8, VP9H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Audio codecsAAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAVAAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC

Connectivity

ModemX60
4G supportLTE Cat. 22LTE Cat. 21
5G supportYesYes
Download speedUp to 7500 MbpsUp to 4700 Mbps
Upload speedUp to 3000 MbpsUp to 2500 Mbps
Wi-Fi66
Bluetooth5.25.3
NavigationGPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVICGPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

AnnouncedDecember 2020December 2022
ClassFlagshipMid range
Model numberSM8350MT6896Z
Official pageQualcomm Snapdragon 888 official siteMediaTek Dimensity 8200 official site

Conclusion

We compared the performance of processors and found out that MediaTek Dimensity 8200 is better than Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 by 14.41%. It has 8 cores at 3.1 GHz and an Mali-G610 MC GPU versus 8 cores at 2.84 GHz with Adreno 660. In the Antutu Benchmark test, MediaTek Dimensity 8200 results were faster than Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 by 11.53%, scoring 942855 points vs 845388 marks. In the 3DMark test, it scored 7011 points against 5308 , which is 32.08% higher.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *