Snapdragon 888 vs Dimensity 1300

We compared two 8-core processors: Snapdragon 888 vs Dimensity 1300. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Snapdragon 888 vs Dimensity 1300

Key Features :

Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 888

  • Performs 66% better in floating-point computations
  • Supports 50% higher memory bandwidth (51.2 against 34.1 GB/s)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (5 versus 6 nm)
  • Shows better (up to 13%) AnTuTu 10 score – 883K vs 782K
  • Better instruction set architecture

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 1300

  • Announced 1-year and 3-months later
  • 6% higher CPU clock speed (3000 vs 2840 MHz)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~7%)

Snapdragon 888 vs Dimensity 1300 AnTuTu & Benchmarks

AnTuTu 10

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios.

Total score883938782427

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance.

NameSnapdragon 888Dimensity 1300
Asset compression164.7 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser101.9 pages/sec
PDF Renderer131.2 Mpixels/sec
Image detection67.1 images/sec
HDR114.5 Mpixels/sec
Background blur11.4 images/sec
Photo processing34.2 images/sec
Ray tracing4.41 Mpixels/sec


A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal).

Graphics test31 FPS26 FPS


Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games

PUBG Mobile83 FPS
Call of Duty: Mobile60 FPS
Fortnite26 FPS
Shadowgun Legends89 FPS
World of Tanks Blitz112 FPS
Genshin Impact58 FPS
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang60 FPS
DeviceAsus Zenfone 8
1080 x 2400


Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 888 and Dimensity 1300


Architecture1x 2.84 GHz – Kryo 680 Prime (Cortex-X1)
3x 2.42 GHz – Kryo 680 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 680 Silver (Cortex-A55)
1x 3 GHz – Cortex-A78
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Frequency2840 MHz3000 MHz
Instruction setARMv8.4-AARMv8.2-A
L1 cache512 KB
L2 cache1 MB
L3 cache4 MB
Process5 nanometers6 nanometers
Transistor count10.3 billion


GPU nameAdreno 660Mali-G77 MP9
ArchitectureAdreno 600Valhall 1st gen
GPU frequency792 MHz850 MHz
Execution units29
Shading units51264
Total shaders1024576
FLOPS1622 Gigaflops979.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version1.11.3
OpenCL version2.02.0
DirectX version12.1


Memory typeLPDDR5LPDDR4X
Memory frequency3200 MHz2133 MHz
Bus4x 16 Bit4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth51.2 Gbit/s34.1 Gbit/s
Max size24 GB16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Neural processor (NPU)Hexagon 780MediaTek APU 3.0
Storage typeUFS 3.0, UFS 3.1UFS 3.1
Max display resolution3840 x 21602520 x 1080
Max camera resolution1x 200MP, 2x 25MP1x 200MP
Video capture8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS4K at 60FPS
Video playback8K at 30FPS4K at 60FPS
Video codecsH.264, H.265, VP8, VP9H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Audio codecsAAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAVAIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV


ModemX60Helio M70
4G supportLTE Cat. 22LTE Cat. 19
5G supportYesYes
Download speedUp to 7500 MbpsUp to 4700 Mbps
Upload speedUp to 3000 MbpsUp to 2500 Mbps
NavigationGPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVICGPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC


AnnouncedDecember 2020March 2022
ClassFlagshipMid range
Model numberSM8350MT6893Z
Official pageQualcomm Snapdragon 888 official siteMediaTek Dimensity 1300 official site


We compared the performance of processors and found out that Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 is better than MediaTek Dimensity 1300 by 19.04%. It has 8 cores at 2.9955 GHz and an Adreno 660 GPU versus 8 cores at 3 GHz with Mali G77MC. In the Antutu Benchmark test, Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus results were faster than MediaTek Dimensity 1300 by 11.94%, scoring 861733 points vs 769833 marks. In the 3DMark test, it scored 5622 points against 4197 , which is 33.95% higher.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *