Mediatek Dimensity 930 vs Snapdragon 695

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (with Adreno 619 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 930 (IMG BXM-8-256) are the two 8-core CPUs that we compared. The advantages and disadvantages of every chip, technical details, and thorough tests in benchmarks like AnTuTu and Geekbench are all available here.

Mediatek Dimensity 930 vs Snapdragon 695

Mediatek Dimensity 930 vs Snapdragon 695 Key Features

Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 695

  • Performs 88% better in floating-point computations
  • Higher GPU frequency (~6%)

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 930

  • Supports 201% higher memory bandwidth (51.2 against 17 GB/s)
  • Announced 7-months later
  • Shows better (up to 5%) AnTuTu 10 score – 462K vs 439K

Snapdragon 695 vs Dimensity 930 Benchmarks

AnTuTu 10

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios.

Snapdragon 695Dimensity 930
CPU153615154546
GPU8172679582
Memory97539103798
UX106511124328
Total score439391462253

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance.

NameSnapdragon 695Dimensity 930
Single-Core907919
Multi-Core21332325
Asset compression106.3 MB/sec115.5 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser58.3 pages/sec62.8 pages/sec
PDF Renderer79.4 Mpixels/sec89.8 Mpixels/sec
Image detection43.4 images/sec46.5 images/sec
HDR68.1 Mpixels/sec73.7 Mpixels/sec
Background blur6.37 images/sec6.86 images/sec
Photo processing20.9 images/sec22.4 images/sec
Ray tracing2.86 Mpixels/sec3.11 Mpixels/sec

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance.

Stability99%
Graphics test7 FPS
Score1199

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games

PUBG Mobile66 FPS
[Low]
Call of Duty: Mobile60 FPS
[Low]
Fortnite24 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends67 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz57 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact19 FPS
[Low]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang42 FPS
[Ultra]
DeviceXiaomi Poco X4 Pro
1080 x 2400

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 695 and Dimensity 930

CPU

Architecture2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)
2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A78
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores88
Frequency2200 MHz2200 MHz
Instruction setARMv8.2-AARMv8.2-A
Process6 nanometers6 nanometers
Transistor count10 billion
TDP4 W4 W
ManufacturingTSMCTSMC

Graphics

GPU nameAdreno 619IMG BXM-8-256
ArchitectureAdreno 600PowerVR IMG GPU
GPU frequency950 MHz900 MHz
Execution units28
Shading units12818
Total shaders256144
FLOPS486.4 Gigaflops259.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version1.11.3
OpenCL version2.03.0
DirectX version12.1

Memory

Memory typeLPDDR4XLPDDR5
Memory frequency2133 MHz3200 MHz
Bus2x 16 Bit4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth17 Gbit/s51.2 Gbit/s
Max size12 GB16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Neural processor (NPU)Hexagon 686Yes
Storage typeeMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1
Max display resolution2520 x 10802520 x 1080
Max camera resolution1x 108MP, 2x 16MP1x 108MP
Video capture1K at 60FPS2K at 30FPS
Video playback1080p at 60FPS2K at 30FPS
Video codecsH.264, H.265, VP8, VP9H.264, H.265, VP9
Audio codecsAAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAVAAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV

Connectivity

ModemSnapdragon X51
4G supportLTE Cat. 18LTE Cat. 18
5G supportYesYes
Download speedUp to 2500 MbpsUp to 2770 Mbps
Upload speedUp to 1500 MbpsUp to 1250 Mbps
Wi-Fi55
Bluetooth5.25.2
NavigationGPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVICGPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

AnnouncedOctober 2021May 2022
ClassMid rangeMid range
Model numberSM6375MT6855, MT6855V/AZA
Official pageQualcomm Snapdragon 695 official siteMediaTek Dimensity 930 official site

Conclusion

After comparing processor performance, we discovered that MediaTek Dimensity 930 outperforms Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 by 48.82%. It has eight 2.2 GHz cores with an IMG BXM-8-256 GPU as opposed to eight 2.2 GHz cores with an Adreno 619. The MediaTek Dimensity 930 outperformed the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 by 32.42% in the Antutu Benchmark test, earning 544734 points as opposed to 411374. It received 2487 points in the 3DMark test as opposed to 1211, a 105.37% increase.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *